Do me a favor, would you please? Read this piece, and flip through a handful of comments.
Notice anything? It appears from the comments that the disparity in research between "how women influence men" and "how men influence women" is ironclad proof of a Feminist Triumph!
First of all, I am assuming that we are excluding for our purposes any research regarding "how marriage influences women" because heterosexual women tend to marry men, if they do marry. Or it could be that studies regarding how marriage affects women tend to have corresponding studies on how marriage affects men.
That being said, I have an alternative to the "Feminist Triumph!" theory. Feminism definitely has a footprint, but we are still very much living in a patriarchal, masculo-normative (is that even a word?) society. Thus, the focus is on how the introduction of women (or "independent variables" as Ms. Waldman states) affects the "norm" of a male-dominated environment. As such, this disparity in research actually evidences how far feminism has yet to go in creating a society where "maleness" and "femaleness" is seen as equally valuable and equally good.