This series of posts is in direct response to this blog post
and the related discussion below. As
much fun as comment whack-a-mole is, it does get time-consuming and
exhausting. So I decided to organize my
thoughts and put them all in one place.
“If you have sex
before marriage, your marriage will be forever cheapened and your bond will be
forever lessened.”
See also: “If you
have sex before marriage, you will forever be comparing your spouse to previous
lovers.”
Really? Based on
what? How do you know?
Part of the problem with discussing this type of issue is
that people have generally walked one path or another, and they have no genuine
concept of what it’s like to walk the other path. Plus, for some reason, people feel the need
to degrade anyone who has chosen differently than they have. I think that must be where we’ve gotten all
these myths and lies about sex; I can’t help but wonder if it wasn’t a
deliberate attempt to slut-shame.
I don’t know anyone who compares their spouse / significant
other to previous partners. I don’t do
it, my husband doesn’t do it, none of my friends do it. What the pro-abstinence group fails to
understand is that each relationship is unique such that there’s really no such
thing as a comparison; it’s a non sequitur.
Now, that doesn’t stop SOME people from trying; except they’re not
really comparing – they’re purposely trying to make their current partner feel
bad about themselves. Again, the issue
is not the sex; the issue is the abusive person trying to emotionally bludgeon
their partner.
“If you have sex
before marriage, you will forever struggle with infidelity.”
It boggles my mind that people seriously think that there’s
no difference between having sex with someone while single (i.e. not committed
to anyone), and cheating on your spouse (whom you have committed to).
I chalk this up to (again) people with no understanding of
interpersonal relationships spouting baseless universals. Here’s a clue: if you waited for sex until
your wedding night, you have no basis from which to tell the rest of us what we
are or will be experiencing.
“After the sexual
revolution, marriage as a whole went down the toilet. Therefore sexual permissiveness leads to bad
marriages.”
What kind of permissiveness?
The kind of permissiveness where you think it’s okay to break a vow of
fidelity you made to your spouse? Yep,
that’ll do it. But that’s not usually
the kind of permissiveness people are talking about.
So, a few other things were happening simultaneously around
that time. Recall that from about 1945
on, we would send large groups of PTSD-afflicted men home to their families and
act like nothing had happened. Mental
health support for returning soldiers was even more nonexistent than it is
now. So what happened? Abuse.
Lots and lots of abuse.(*) These
were very sick men and we released them on our most vulnerable people – women
(pre-feminism) and children. PatrickStewart discusses his particular experience with great wisdom. Suddenly there’s a lot fewer people teaching
their children about love and healthy relationships. Suddenly a lot more children grow up without
an example of what a healthy relationship is.
And we blame the decline in marriage on sexual permissiveness? One has nothing to do with the other.
(*) This is the closest thing I could find on my assertion,
and here is the post it came from. Notice
the spikes that kinda sorta coincide with when PTSD men would be coming back
from combat. I am actually having a really hard time finding support either way
for my assertion – I dunno, maybe I fail at Google? I would genuinely appreciate anything that you
could direct me toward, because I want to know if I am right or wrong. I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to
say that if the rate of homicide peaked, the rate of domestic violence peaked,
because both result from mentally ill people.
“Married sex is the
best sex.”
This is mostly true.
Except when it’s not.
See also: “Sex
outside of marriage is inherently abusive.”
Marriage is not a magic wand, but you wouldn’t know it by
listening to the Cult of Virginity folks.
Again, see my earlier point about symmetry in relationships. Sex within marriage can be plenty demeaning
and abusive, as I experienced in my first marriage. All of the sex I had outside marriage (even
the casual sex) was far more healthy, both emotionally and spiritually than ANY
of the sex I had in my first marriage.
After I finally got divorced (and I thank God every day for the existence
of no-fault divorce), all the sex I had afterward brought me joy and healing
and made me ready to be a good wife to my second husband. Sex with my husband now is by far and away
the best sex ever, because of the love we share and because of the marriage we
have built. Everything I did before my husband just pales in comparison and fades into the background. Not sure how my experience before is "cheapening" my relationship with my husband if it occupies exactly zero space in my mind.
“If you have sex
before marriage the relationship will become all about the sex.”
Tell me, what’s to stop a relationship from becoming all
about the sex after marriage, hmm?
If I may submit for your consideration, couple A and couple
B.
Couple A – Has sex
on the first date (or third, or twelfth – doesn’t matter). Lives together for about a year, goes through
some really formative experiences together, and decide to get married because
they are right for each other.
Couple B – Decides
to wait for sex until marriage. Spends
their days counting down to the wedding date, unable to think or talk about
anything except how they can’t wait to have sex with each other. Sure they talk about their compatibility, but
it’s all theoretical since their various assertions of “oh we’re so perfect
together!” are never really put to the test.
Plus they have a bad case of “saying what they think the other person
wants to hear” since they can’t stand the thought of starting all over in the
dating pool and waiting even LONGER to have sex.
Which one of these relationships is “all about sex”
again? That’s what I thought.
Far too frequently, people that are waiting until marriage
rush down the aisle far too quickly so that they can have sex, only to find
out, after the sexual tension is gone, that they are horribly wrong for each
other.
“But Athena,” I hear, “your example couples don’t really
exist. The male in couple A wouldn’t
even ask for a second date because he doesn’t respect the female. That’s just how guys work. And couple B would never happen because
people who are waiting until marriage are very careful about who they marry and
wouldn’t make that mistake.”
Oh really? Would it
blow your mind to know that couple A is my husband and me? Lived together for 9 months, married for 5
years (so far). He loves my daughters
like his own and we just had a baby boy in May.
Couple A is also a couple in our group of friends. Lived together for 5 years, married for 2
years (so far).
As for couple B, how else do you explain the significantly
higher divorce rate in populations where people are religious and get marriedyoung? Hmmmm? (Not perfect congruence, obviously, because
there are other factors at work. But you
can’t ignore this factor.)
“Just because
everybody’s doing it doesn’t make it okay.”
Maybe not. But you
can’t go around claiming that sex outside of marriage will lead to the utmost
of disasters and the end of the world when almost
everybody is doing it and
civilization has yet to collapse. In
fact, most people seem to do just fine, with no ill effects.
No comments:
Post a Comment